Insights View all

2026 SEQRA Amendments

What New York Municipalities Need to Know

The State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) has been amended several times since it was enacted by the New York State Legislature in 1975. SEQRA requires local, regional, and state government agencies to evaluate the environmental impacts of proposed discretionary actions, such as real estate development projects. In 2026, several important updates were made to both the statute and its implementing regulations to address environmental justice, climate- and weather-related hazards, and development obstacles for specific types of real estate development projects.

Collectively, these changes expand the environmental issues municipal boards must consider during the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process while also revising timeframes associated with project review and even creating new Type II actions and statutory exemptions. For example, new topics that need to be considered include a proposed project’s proximity to a disadvantaged community, a proposed project’s vulnerability to damage from a projected 100-year flood, and newly created exemptions for affordable housing and municipal water and wastewater infrastructure projects.

Environmental Justice Siting Law Amendments to SEQRA

New York State enacted the Environmental Justice Siting Law in 2022. The law requires environmental justice considerations to be incorporated into state and local decision-making affecting disadvantaged communities. Effective on June 12, 2026, the SEQRA amendments implementing the Environmental Justice Siting Law include revisions to both the SEQRA regulations and the Environmental Assessment Forms (EAFs).

The Environmental Justice Siting Law amendments to SEQRA require the lead agency (or the principal agency responsible for undertaking, funding, or approving a project) to determine, as part of its determination of significance, whether a proposed project may cause or increase a disproportionate pollution burden on a disadvantaged community. This includes evaluating impacts within a disadvantaged community or within one-half mile of a disadvantaged community.

The Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) now includes questions regarding a project’s proximity to a disadvantaged community, consistency with community climate change plans, air emissions, and potential climate- and weather-related hazards. A lead agency must evaluate an applicant’s responses in Part 1 when completing Part 2 of the FEAF, which now includes additional questions addressing these new considerations.

For example, proposed air pollutant emissions or new sources of solid waste generation may trigger additional environmental review. Type I actions, which require a FEAF review and may require an Environmental Impact Statement, also require consideration of future physical climate risks. These include a project’s vulnerability to a projected 100-year flood and whether the project could increase the vulnerability of human or ecological communities to future climate or weather hazards.

The Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) has likewise been updated to include questions regarding disadvantaged communities. As with the FEAF, the lead agency must evaluate the applicant’s responses in Part 1 when completing Part 2.

The SEQRA regulations also establish new Type II classifications, which do not require a FEAF or SEAF review, for certain residential construction projects, including:

  • Multi-family dwellings consisting of three-family residences
  • Certain residential buildings with four or more dwelling units under 10,000 square feet that satisfy specified criteria, including the availability of existing on-site utilities and compliance with applicable zoning requirements
  • Construction and rehabilitation of accessory structures, including sidewalks, parking areas, playgrounds, and landscaping

“Let Them Build” Amendments to SEQRA

In 2026, following an active legislative session, additional statutory amendments were enacted as part of Governor Hochul’s “Let Them Build” agenda to streamline the SEQR process.

These statutory changes create several new, narrowly tailored SEQRA exemptions, including exemptions for certain multi-family housing, parkland and trail, green infrastructure, and water and wastewater infrastructure projects, as well as public school facilities connected to existing water and sewer systems in New York City.

One of the changes is a statutory definition of “previously disturbed” parcels, which applies to several of the new exemptions listed above. This new statutory definition includes parcels that have been substantially altered by prior development. Parcels recently used for agricultural purposes or parcels located in certain flood or coastal zone hazard areas are excluded from this definition. Of note, specific criteria apply based on the size of the municipality.

Applicants can seek judicial relief if an application for a permit or authorization is not determined to be exempt from SEQR within 120 days of receipt by the reviewing agency (subject to extensions in specific circumstances). Once a lead agency is established, the lead agency only has one year to determine if a project will require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). For projects involving an application for a permit or authorization, a lead agency has two years to complete the EIS after the date the draft EIS is determined to be required (subject to extensions in specific circumstances).

Finally, these statutory changes revise the statute of limitations governing judicial challenges to SEQRA determinations by clarifying when the limitations period begins to run after the lead agency’s determination becomes final and binding on the applicant.

What Municipalities Need to Know

What Municipalities Need to Know

  • If a proposed project is located within or within one-half mile of a disadvantaged community, the lead agency must evaluate whether the project may cause or increase a disproportionate pollution burden on that community.
  • Type I actions now require consideration of future physical climate risks, including a project’s vulnerability to damage from a projected 100-year flood and whether the project could increase climate- or weather-related risks to human or ecological communities.
  • Governor Hochul’s “Let Them Build” initiative also created several new, narrowly tailored SEQRA exemptions for certain projects, including qualifying multi-family housing, parkland and trail, green infrastructure, water and wastewater infrastructure, and New York City school facility projects.
  • These changes do not eliminate existing regulatory requirements governing wetlands, floodplains, stormwater management, endangered species, or other environmental permitting programs.

Successful project planning will continue to require proactive environmental review, early due diligence, and coordination with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and qualified environmental consultants who can help navigate these evolving requirements in New York State.

About the Author
Frances Kabat, JD
Environmental Impact Group Program Manager

As Environmental Impact Group Program Manager, Frances focuses on environmental compliance and project management for solar projects. She brings her legal background and development experience to her work for municipal, developer, and affordable housing clients. Frances has previous experience advising clients on real estate, land use, and environmental law matters, including review of Article 10/94-c applications and project submittals, SEQRA documentation for municipalities, and litigation for community solar projects.

Additionally, Frances has real estate development experience, including site selection, obtaining local approvals, providing civil and architectural design oversight, developing financing applications, construction monitoring, and assisting with real estate closings. She also performs SEQRA and NEPA reviews and manages SHPO consultations for affordable housing projects, as well as analyzes potential environmental impacts from nearby industrial/manufacturing facilities, railroads/railyards, dams, and remediation sites to determine project site suitability for affordable housing development.